Opposition to Unite Against Corrupt Presidential Elections

January 26, 2018

On Sunday January 28 demonstrations will take place across Russia against the re-election of Vladimir Putin, scheduled to coincide with the 4 year anniversary of the annexation of Crimea.  Open Russia founder Mikhail Khodorkovsky and the Movement’s council have called the elections “pseudo-elections” and “part of an elaborate showcase designed to give off the image of an election”.  After 18 years in power Vladimir Putin and his entourage have consolidated power and influence in such a way that no challenger has a chance to unseat him.

In many cities, including both Moscow and St. Petersburg, the demonstrations have not been officially authorized by the local authorities, which means that participants will potentially face charges of being involved in an ‘illegal demonstration’.  This will no doubt provoke a harsh response from the authorities, who last year detained over 1500 people during public demonstrations.

Open Russia founder Mikhail Khodorkovsky recently stated that he considers the March 18 presidential elections to be a facade: “If there was to be an election in 2018 by some miracle, it is highly likely that Putin would lose. Instead, in 2018 we’re going to see a show called ‘Presidential Election.’ It cannot be won, because it is a show. The show will go exactly as the producer has planned.”

Alexey Navalny, who is seen as the main organiser of the Jan 28 demonstrations said: “Yes, they have stolen the elections from us, but we will not give up.”

Presidential candidate “against all” Ksenia Sobchak has expressed her support for the demonstrations, after Alexey Navalny — initially the forefront opposition candidate for president — was barred from running and his support fund was liquidated.  Sobchak spoke out on her website that “I support decisive protest action against the illegal and unconstitutional actions taken by those in power against Alexey Navalny.”

Open Russia activists across the country have been promoting an active boycott of the elections  emphasising the necessity for public engagement and regular, visible public protest. Going to the polls and voting for any other candidate or spoiling the ballot is a more sensible option than a passive boycott of non-participation, which effectively hands victory uncontested to the ruling elite.

Alexander Soloviev, Chairman of the Open Russia Movement, has commented:

 “We support a strike, but not a boycott.  What’s the difference? A boycott is too often mistaken for an ‘armchair protest’, but a strike is a an active demonstration.  There’s not a boycott in history that led to power changing hands, but regular strike action is an effective way to peacefully bring about change.” 

Open Russia’s Human Rights Team is on call to provide emergency legal assistance to all citizens involved in the nationwide demonstrations who find themselves being detained and carried off to a police cell.

The vague, yet unbending laws against public gatherings in Russia mean that organisers and participants of demonstrations are liable to hefty fines and, in some cases, even jail time for attending public demonstrations that have not been officially authorized by the authorities.

Open Russia founder Mikhail Khodorkovsky will also be holding a livestream discussion in Moscow on February 3 to discuss the presidential elections and the future of Russia, as well as to take questions from local people.